| |
|
ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for January 12, 2013
Double-Star Systems Can Be Dangerous for Exoplanets http://news.yahoo.com/double-star-systems-dangerous-exoplanets-191252268.html?.tsrc=yahoo Exoplanets circling a star with a far-flung stellar companion — worlds that are part of "wide binary" systems — are susceptible to violent and dramatic orbital disruptions, including outright ejection. The study was published today (Jan. 6) in the journal Nature and will be presented by Kaib at the 221st meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Long Beach, Calif., on Monday (Jan. 7). [and from another] Would the Zetas care to comment on the timing of the above article, in terms of the cover-up vs disclosure tug of war? It describes the exact scenario PX is embroiled in, while backing up its assertions with no credible examples, opting instead for "computer simulations" and "modeling." This article would only make sense after a disclosure of the nearby PX, as an explanation of how it got there, etc. Its agenda is unclear; it looks like anticipatory, before-the-fact damage control. Could the Zetas please add their insights? [and from another] How about this one? It seems a lot of info is coming out at the moment. http://www.space.com/19044-alien-earth-exoplanets-2013.html While astronomers have found a number of exoplanets over the last few years that share one or two key traits with our own world — such as size or inferred surface temperature — they have yet to bag a bona fide "alien Earth." But that should change in 2013.
At the start of the ZetaTalk saga, astronomers claimed that a wandering
planet was not theoretically possible, nor were they known. Within two
years after ZetaTalk described the process, a sling orbit flinging past
both suns in a binary system, astronomers had discovered evidence of such
a slinging planet. Now they proudly proclaim their discoveries, with nary
a mention of ZetaTalk insights they relied upon. Such borrowing of
ZetaTalk scientific concepts to fine-tune scientific exploration is quite
common, and unfortunately, arrogant man refusing to give credit where
credit is due is also quite common.
It has become apparent, through web reports etc, that images generated from readings taken by NOAA/NWS Doppler radar installations in Lincoln, IL, are featuring anomalous beam-like "artifacts", among other irregular apparitions. This allegedly has so-called experts scratching their heads, though given whom it is that operates said facilities, one can never be sure. Although they are "not sure what it is yet" it does not stop them speculating: http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=ilx Back in July '12, a youtube user, though similarly waxing whimsical, apparently recorded what appear to be similar anomalous readings: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iameSY7xaZo ZT fans know that radar etc is periodically affected by the PX Tail influence http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta558.htm , but this looks different, is Doppler, and, hypotheses abound, few if any holding water. Would the Z please speak to this? Is the Big Bully messing up their imagery, through his various influences etc? [and from another] What, exactly, is that radar anomaly in Mason County? January 3, 2013. http://www.pjstar.com/news/x1926905472/What-exactly-is-that-radar-anomaly-in-Mason-County?photo=0 It may not be extraterrestrial activity, but a permanent imprint on the central Illinois Doppler radar even has the National Weather Service stumped. The National Weather Service's website indicated the problem might stem from recent construction on an electronics tower in Lincoln, but the precise cause still is unresolved.
We previously explained that the emergence of radar
circles near the S Pole was due to clumping of particles related to
magnetic particles. This clumping was caused by the deflection of the
Earth’s S Pole, during the twisting of the Earth’s magnetosphere by the
near presence of Planet X. What is it about Lincoln, Illinois that would
cause a similar clumping, albeit only in one direction, a spot of the
wheel rather than the entire wheel?
The bowing of the N American continent has pulled rock strata apart in the
region, especially across the Mississippi which will of course have
numerous bridges rupturing when the Mississippi spreads apart during the
New Madrid adjustment. Chicago also is not exempt, as it lies between the
weak points in the crust represented by the path of the Mississippi River
and the path the New Madrid Fault Line itself takes under the Great Lakes.
All pull apart. Roiling magma can incite a magnetic field, especially if
it is iron heavy. This field is lacking a distinct S Pole return, as the
Lincoln radar pattern shows.
My question involves this new article released today on NBC news; warning that climate could be "hijacked" by "rouge" geoengineers. I noticed many key words like the paper calling it X Factors and even listing things like the discovery of alien life profoundly affecting society. While everyone on this Ning knows that global warming is just a cover for the Earth Changes; is this article another admission without saying so outright? [and from another] http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/09/16435593-a-warning-climate-could-be-hijacked The global climate may already be changing faster than humans are prepared to adapt to, heralding a shift in the climate change debate from who to blame to how to cope, according to a new report from the World Economic Forum. In addition to the climate spinning out of control and rogue geoengineers, other X factors identified in the report include: ethical dilemmas over new drugs and devices that could make us smarter; medical advances that could deliver a world overpopulated with “a mass of arthritic, demented, and, above all, expensive elderly who are in need of long term care and palliative solutions; " the discovery of alien life, which could have profound societal impacts.
What will those elements of human society who expect the little man, the
common man, to look up to them do
when the world turns upside down, literally, and devastates their way of
life.
How can these elite, used to the respect and even the awe of the common
man, maintain their perch when the truth is out? How can they get on top
in a rapidly changing world where Zeta-Human hybrids begin to mingle with
the survivors, and survivors have a tenuous grasp on health and happiness,
grateful for any help they may get? These elites are trying to leave the
impression that their think tanks are formulating answers, so that in the
fog that follows the Pole Shift survivors will remember these discussions
and think that somehow the elite in human society made the good things
happen.
Spectacular pictures of a dust storm taken by a tug boat worker off the Western Australia coast are all over the media today. I have never witnessed anything like this previously off the WA coast and tend to think it may be wobble related with the inland storm suddenly finding itself over the water as the ground moved below. In several pictures it appears the sun is setting over the water behind the storm suggesting it is a reasonable distance from the shoreline. Would the Zetas comment on as to whether this is a natural phenomenon or wobble induced? [and from another] http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/01/11/08/04/cyclone-whips-up-dust-storm The thunderstorm, unrelated to Tropical Cyclone Narelle, which is due to make landfall later today, appeared at sunset on Wednesday evening off the coast of Onslow, in the Pilbara region in WA's northwest. "The storm was casually building in the distance, then it got faster and faster and it went from glass to about 40 knots in two minutes," Mr Martin told The West Australian newspaper. "It was like a big dust storm under a thunderhead, there was a lot of lightning but not a lot of rain." “A Bureau of Meteorology forecaster said wind and rain caused the storm to dump sand and dust it had collected while passing Onslow. He said such storms were normal for the region at this time of year”.
One clue that the wobble is involved is the sudden change in wind speed,
from dead calm to gusty. Another clue is the direction of wind. If
normally coming in from the ocean at sunset, then it is not normal for the
winds to blow outward from land. During the day, the land heats up, thus
reducing the air pressure so that winds come from the ocean, rather than
the other way around. A third clue is that sand storm do not carry out
over the ocean, due to the extra humidity picked up by the winds over the
oceans so that rain results, clearing the air of the dust particles. Where
the public is not getting an explanation as yet from any source other than
ZetaTalk, they are noticing, and becoming uneasy.