Re: Planet X: Visible SIZE, Estimate 1
A month ago, I tried to initiate a discussion on size estimates, asking
the SIZE of the object imaged on Jan 5 and 19, 2002 compared to
neighboring stars, and got nada posted on sci.astro except the usual
catcalling from the usual crowd, who seldom if ever address the issues.
I asked, a month ago:
Please state this size as:
- a comparison to planet XYZ (visible to amateurs, i.e. Jupiter)
- a number of pixels in diameter when viewed with
XYZ scope, or XYZ magnification
- as large as XYZ star cluster or galazy, or percent thereof.
(http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use07142.htm)
However, private mail was different. Thus, once again, in preparation
for the mid-September time frame when the Zetas have promised to deliver
new coordinates, I'll attempt to initiate a REAL discussion of relative
size of the object imaged on Jan 5 and 19, 2001, when compared to
neighboring stars, and how this might extrapolate into size this coming
Fall and Winter, as Planet X approaches passage on May 15, 2003.
CONTRIBUTION 1:
Using Robert's Table of Distances, human computation/estimate of the
distance given the Zeta statement that during the 7 years approaching
the passage, when Planet X rapidly approaches the Sun from a virtual
stand-still between its two foci, it picks up speed at an exponential
rate. Note the negative numbers below are due to the Sun-Pluto distance
being taken from the Sun, and Robert is expressing the distance from EARTH,
which is on the opposite side of the Sun during these last weeks, Planet
X being in the Sun at that time. We have:
Weeks Px Dist in Dist in
to go Date S-P Unit B. mls.
52 5/7/02 7.593147 27.904
39 8/7/02 6.68259 24.558
26 11/7/02 5.2965 19.464
13 2/7/03 3.1865 11.71
9.7 3/2/03 2.494 9.1665
5 4/2/03 1.37176 5.0412
3 4/16/03 0.83987 3.0865
2 4/23/03 0.5607 2.060
1 4/30/03 0.33093 1.216
0 5/7/03 -.02529 -.0929
(http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03a.htm)