Re: Planet X: Dec 4 Images!

Michael L Cunningham wrote:

> I M Openmind wrote:
>
> > I think you mean:
> > USNO Star Mag:  15.1 (Blue)  13.8 (Red)
> > Field: 476
> > Magnitude: 14.29
> > RA: 04h 22m 49.85s  Dec: +12°07'44.16"
> > RA: 04h 22m 40.05s  Dec: +12°07'19.92"  (Epoch 2000)
> >
> > but this is the bright (relatively) star just above and to the right
> > of the frame 3 defect chosen by Lieder as the "white" persona.  Havas
> > is excited by his "red" persona which seems to be a star and which is
> > not apparent in my 11 disk copy of the USNO-a2.0
>
> You are correct as I was working with limited information. I never saw
> the image with the "red & white personas" circled until I got home tonight.
>
> Irregardless, after re-examining the images (again) against this new
> information there is nothing there in either spot. They're chasing noise
> and defects (again).
>
> The "team" earns an F from the astronomers who they spam with their
> nonsense.
>
> Michael

Now that we have determined that Michael Cunningham doesn't know what he is
talking about, and makes accusations without full knowledge, and then gives
the "messenger" an "F" for being the mere messenger of data.... what can we
conclude from Mr. Havas's image of the blatent red filtered "anomoly" in a
spot where it should "not" be according to past imaging?

Take your time... we have about 4 months or so.

ElTonyO